2017年9月24日的雅思写作考试还是一如既往地老题重现，这道题其实在2014年04月05日的考试中就和考生们见过面。此次的再相逢，其实并没有给考生带来任何的惊吓。对于有一定备考的考生而言，本题带来的肯定是惊喜。

　　无论是从提问方式还是从话题分类的角度而言，该题的难度都非常有限。环球教育杨亮老师为大家拆解9月24日雅思写作范文如下。

　　原题如下：

　　An increasing number of people choose to change their jobs and residential places several times in their life. It is a positive or negative development? 20170916

　　审题之后，相信有过备考经历的考生肯定能够瞬间想到一个自己熟悉的文章框架来论证这个题目。下文，采用了一个并不常见的方式来论证这个题目，只为给各位多一些参考，引起多一些思考，仅此而已。

　　Our contemporary society makes many things impossible before possible now, like people’s often changing their jobs and places of residence, which even can be thought as a fashionable trend over majority of people. Facing countless new things is what traditional people are naturally afraid of. However, their worries are to a great extent unnecessary.

　　开头段，逻辑清晰简单。首先是引出题目的背景句，紧随其后的就是点明本文的主题。第三句，直白表达了笔者的立场。

　　The primary worry of traditional people is that frequent job hopping is not conducive to accumulating continuous working experience. Nevertheless, changing jobs does not imply being employed in a totally new field. Usually people like to find a new job related to the previous one. Hence, they can gain relatively abundant working experience since they have worked in various working environments. Besides, once people have no interest in their current jobs, no matter how much working experience they have gained, it is definitely futile and meaningless for them.

　　主段一，其实是一个让步段。先说很多传统的人对于这个趋势的担忧。换言之，就是这个趋势可能带来的消极影响。再通过让步的方式，将其逆转。通过这个让步逻辑来论证笔者的立场。

　　Another conservative concern is that moving to a new place to settle down means people have to build a new social circle and they might have less or no time to maintain the existing one. Notwithstanding, establishing new social networking is tough, but it is also a kind of essential skill that people in modern society ought to master. Additionally, people by using new communication technology are able to socialize with anyone they want no matter where they are. In other words, related new technology has already overcome the geographic limitation of social circle.

　　主段二，如法炮制。也是先引出一个反面观点，再将其驳倒。通常文章中，让步段只有一个，但是本文却偏偏两个主段都是让步段。并且，在此之后就直接结尾。

　　Admittedly, there are many advantages brought by this new tendency, such as people’s enjoying different cultures, extending their social circle and building diverse working experience. Meanwhile, the above two worries are absolutely solvable, and therefore this emerging trend is without any doubt a positive one.

　　结尾段的最开始，通过一句话泛泛而言，说明了这个趋势的优势还是非常明显的。此外，它的两个可能的缺陷都是可以被修正弥补的。由此一来，论证出笔者在首段中已经表明的立场。

　　相信大家读此文章时，心中多有不爽。此不爽多源自于本文和以往此提问方式的参考文章非同一路数。无好坏之分，无伯仲之别。

　　行文仓促，多有不足，有待斧正。